Blog

Artificial Intelligence has quickly become the food industry’s buzzword of the year. From predictive compliance to AI-powered customer service, the potential is enormous. But for many companies, the question remains: Where do we start? The truth is, AI adoption is not a leap—it’s a journey. And like any journey, it needs a roadmap.

Traceability has always been a cornerstone of food safety. Knowing where a product came from, how it was handled, and where it went is critical for recalls, compliance, and consumer trust. Yet despite decades of effort, most food traceability systems are still fragmented, manual, and slow.AI is now emerging as the accelerator—filling gaps, reducing manual work, and turning traceability into a real-time capability.

Food companies depend on vast, complex supplier networks. But traditional supplier management often relies on backward-looking scorecards—lagging indicators of quality or delivery performance. By the time a supplier issue shows up in the data, it may already have disrupted your business. AI offers a better way: proactive, predictive supplier management.

The food supply chain has always been fragmented. Farmers, processors, distributors, retailers, and regulators each generate their own records, often in incompatible systems—or worse, on paper. The result? Gaps, delays, and blind spots that make compliance and collaboration harder than they need to be. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can’t magically erase those siloes. But it can act as the translator, harmonizer, and accelerator that makes supply chain transparency possible.

For decades, compliance in the food industry has been about one thing: checking boxes. Did you record this? Did you verify that? Did you keep the paperwork? It’s reactive, time-consuming, and often burdensome.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is everywhere in today’s business headlines, and the food industry is no exception. From predictive demand planning to real-time traceability, the promises of AI are exciting. But here’s the catch: without digital transformation, those promises remain out of reach. The uncomfortable truth is simple: no digital, no AI.

When it comes to FSMA Rule 204, the FDA isn’t just asking you to follow the breadcrumbs—they want the entire recipe, oven settings, and proof of delivery. The new traceability rule raises the bar on how food companies capture, manage, and share data. For leaders, that means compliance can’t be solved with a quick software purchase or a well-worded email to IT. What’s needed is a technical systems roadmap—a deliberate plan that bridges regulation, operations, and technology.

Some airline catering companies assume FSMA Rule 204 is meant for farms and grocery stores — not for operations in airport kitchens or airline trolleys. That assumption could put your business at risk. As the FDA’s traceability rule (FSMA Rule 204) gains traction, it's critical to reassess how your operations fit into the compliance picture — especially if you handle foods on the Food Traceability List (FTL).

With the FDA’s recent 30-month extension for FSMA Rule 204compliance, many food companies are reassessing their traceability initiatives. For some, the extra time may seem like permission to pause or deprioritize investments. But for those who stay the course - continuing to implement smarter traceability systems - the delay offers a rare opportunity: a chance to lead.

Digital Transformation: Every so often, a question floats out of the corporate ether—perhaps from a CFO poking around LinkedIn or whispering to an AI assistant—and it actually gets me excited.

So, you’re diving into traceability—maybe to boost efficiency, meet compliance, or finally get a grip on your supply chain spaghetti. You’ve read the articles, heard the pitches, and maybe even sat through a vendor webinar or two. And now you’re wondering: “Do global standards actually matter?”

FDA traceback investigations under FSMA Rule 204 demand more than mock recalls—this two-part guide helps teams proactively plan for real scenarios, data requests, and compliance with traceability requirements.